The Death and Life of Great American Cities

Founder's Bookshelf / Book

The Death and Life of Great American Cities

Book by Jane Jacobs

Jane Jacobs had no degree in urban planning, architecture, or engineering. She was a journalist who lived in Greenwich Village and watched her neighborhood work. In 1961, she published this book arguing that everything the urban planning establishment believed was wrong. They never forgave her.

*post may include affiliate links, view our Disclaimer for more info.

About The Death and Life of Great American Cities

In the 1950s, American cities were being demolished and rebuilt according to the theories of planners like Robert Moses in New York and Le Corbusier in Europe. The theory: old neighborhoods were slums. The solution: tear them down, build highways through them, replace the dense, mixed-use streetscapes with towers surrounded by open space. Separate residential from commercial. Get cars moving. Make everything clean, orderly, and modern.

Jane Jacobs looked at what these plans actually produced and saw dead zones. The open spaces were empty because nobody wanted to linger in them. The towers were isolated because there was nothing at street level to walk to. The highways cut neighborhoods in half. The projects that replaced old tenements were more dangerous than the streets they replaced, because the sidewalk life that had kept people safe, the watchers in windows, the shopkeepers on stoops, the children on the block, had been designed away.

The Death and Life of Great American Cities is her counterargument. It is built on observation rather than theory. Jacobs watched how her neighborhood in Greenwich Village actually worked: the short blocks that encouraged walking, the mixed uses that kept the sidewalks active at all hours, the old buildings that housed small businesses because the rents were low, the casual surveillance that came from having many eyes on the street.

Her argument is that cities work when they are dense, diverse, and messy. Short blocks create more intersections and more routes, which means more pedestrian traffic, which means more activity, which means more safety. Mixed uses, shops, apartments, offices, restaurants, on the same block, keep streets active throughout the day. Old buildings alongside new ones create a range of rents that allows both established businesses and startups to coexist. Jacobs calls this organized complexity, and she argues it is the opposite of what planners were creating with their orderly, segregated designs.

The book was published in 1961 and immediately attacked by the planning establishment. Jacobs had no academic credentials. She was a woman in a male-dominated field. She was challenging the theories of people who had spent careers building the systems she was criticizing. None of that mattered. The book won because it described reality better than the theories it replaced.

Jacobs later fought Robert Moses’s plan to build a highway through lower Manhattan and won. She moved to Toronto in 1968 and continued writing about cities and economics until her death in 2006. The Death and Life of Great American Cities has never gone out of print. Urban planners still argue about it, which is itself a measure of its influence.